Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the legal and ethical implications of fair use in the context of generative AI, referencing a court case involving Meta. It highlights concerns about copyright infringement and market impact, referencing a late individual's contributions to the discussion.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on a legal and ethical issue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by referencing a court case and previous discussions on fair use, encouraging informed dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Meta's legal stance without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.