Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages with public discourse by discussing predictions about AI development and safety, referencing Stuart Russell's views. It acknowledges the potential for AI to surpass human capabilities and the likelihood of government inaction on AI safety. The tone is analytical and speculative, showing agreement with Russell's predictions while expressing skepticism about the timeline.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and engages with the topic thoughtfully. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by discussing potential future scenarios in AI development. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with most points but questioning the timeline. [+1]