In reply to:
The statement critiques the influence of a political figure, Clyburn, on the Democratic Party in South Carolina, suggesting it is undemocratic. This engages with public issues related to political influence and party dynamics, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language but critiques a political figure's influence, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on political influence rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more critical in nature.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political figure's influence but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue without resorting to misinformation or harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.