In reply to:
Kevin Chong
@krrkc
·
5d
The statement critiques a public figure, suggesting they break the law without facing consequences, and implies their actions benefit their family. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of legality and privilege.
- The statement could be seen as harmful as it accuses someone of criminal behavior without evidence, potentially spreading misinformation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it makes personal accusations. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.