Gary Marcus

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 117
5/12/2025, 3:50:35 PM
X
In reply to:
赂
@Superkindnsweet
路
72d
@GaryMarcus @JamesSurowiecki Okay, that makes total sense.

So no robots to do my job and no God level AI next year 馃ぃ

Thank you.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
72d
@Superkindnsweet @JamesSurowiecki Huge amount of money for a flawed technology based on huge imagine returns that are still extremely speculative.
赂
@Superkindnsweet
路
72d
@GaryMarcus @JamesSurowiecki I don't fully understand. Is it the loans are just risky or that they are too much?

I know you always got a good take on this sort of stuff and curious about your explanation.

Hope all is good.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
72d
@JamesSurowiecki this will be really bad.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
72d
This is going to end badly.

Bailout-level badly.

The statement 'Definitely not' is a brief response in a conversation about the speculative nature of AI and technology investments. It appears to dismiss the idea of imminent advanced AI or robots taking over jobs, as mentioned in the preceding conversation. The tone is casual and dismissive, contributing to a lighthearted exchange rather than a serious debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a lighthearted exchange.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but maintains a casual tone.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks and is part of a friendly dialogue.