The statement critiques the use of IQ tests as a measure of AI intelligence, suggesting that improvements in test scores do not equate to genuine advancements in AI capabilities. It engages in public discourse by addressing the evaluation of AI progress.
- The statement does not cause harm and encourages a more nuanced understanding of AI intelligence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning the validity of using IQ tests for AI evaluation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI evaluation methods without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.