The statement questions whether Sam Altman is adhering to his commitments regarding AI safety made during a 2023 Senate hearing. It references a claim by Gary Marcus that Altman is not following through on his promises, raising concerns about accountability and transparency in AI governance.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm if AI safety promises are not kept, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public commitments rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a public issue related to AI safety. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the adherence to public commitments without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.