Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/15/2025, 9:15:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Malcolm Mason Rodriguez
@malcolmjmr
·
227d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks @BigTechnology Wait you did a pod with Lex on this in 2019! Haven’t listened yet. I wonder how it’s aged.
Malcolm Mason Rodriguez
@malcolmjmr
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @DanHendrycks Would love to see you elaborate on how LLMs can be integrated with symbolic AI. Really enjoyed your appearance on @BigTechnology
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
@DanHendrycks My view about all this is extremely different; would you be willing to do a podcast about it, since it requires some depth and is important?
Dan Hendrycks
@DanHendrycks
·
231d
AI models are dramatically improving at IQ tests (70 IQ → 120), yet they don't feel vastly smarter than two years ago.

At their current level of intelligence, rehashing existing human writings will work better than leaning on their own intelligence to produce novel analysis.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on AI and its development, specifically regarding the relevance and aging of a podcast episode. It reflects on the enduring relevance of the content discussed in the podcast, suggesting that the insights remain pertinent over time.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the continued relevance of the podcast content. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by reflecting on the quality and relevance of past discussions. [+1]