Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement criticizes a political figure for allegedly prioritizing personal gain over national interests, specifically in the context of AI technology deals. It uses a strong, accusatory tone.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by making serious accusations without evidence, which could mislead or inflame public opinion. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, engaging in a personal attack rather than a constructive critique. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue and instead uses a provocative tone, which may hinder understanding and empathy. [-2]