Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 5:19:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Rizzn Hopkins
@rizzn
·
229d
@GaryMarcus It's an impossible (and therefore useless) example as the idea of vibecoding has been a viable practice for a few months. There is no "test of time."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
229d
@rizzn see the test of time that i just posted under the OP, and respond to that if you have a counterexample
Mark Rizzn Hopkins
@rizzn
·
229d
@GaryMarcus Sounds like cope.

BTW, I am a CS guy.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
229d
A computer scientist’s perspective on vibe coding:

The statement engages in a debate about the validity and longevity of 'vibe coding' as a practice, questioning the premature declarations of its success. It suggests a need for a 'test of time' to validate claims, implying skepticism about current assertions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is cautious and suggests waiting for more evidence before declaring success, which aligns with a careful approach to avoid harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement challenges the opposing view but does so without personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the argument rather than the individual. [+1]