Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 5:20:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Mark Rizzn Hopkins
@rizzn
·
229d
@GaryMarcus Let's get real about half his examples: Saying that Visual Basic (which is, really, Visual Studio, which is now VSC) didn't stand the "test of time" is asinine.

Most of the world's code funnels thru VSC or a derivative.
Mark Rizzn Hopkins
@rizzn
·
229d
@GaryMarcus It's an impossible (and therefore useless) example as the idea of vibecoding has been a viable practice for a few months. There is no "test of time."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
229d
@rizzn see the test of time that i just posted under the OP, and respond to that if you have a counterexample
Mark Rizzn Hopkins
@rizzn
·
229d
@GaryMarcus Sounds like cope.

BTW, I am a CS guy.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
A computer scientist’s perspective on vibe coding:

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities and limitations of programming tools and the experience required to use them effectively. It argues against the notion that complex systems can be built without debugging experience, emphasizing the importance of skilled programmers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on a technical argument. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by clarifying misconceptions about programming tools and experience. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]