Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the quality of AI discussions on social media and the impact of anonymity on these discussions. It critiques the prevalence of pseudonymous accounts in AI discourse and suggests a solution to improve the quality of discussions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies that pseudonymous users contribute to low-quality discourse, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not naming individuals but criticizes pseudonymous users collectively, which could be seen as a form of indirect cyberbullying. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it generalizes about pseudonymous users without acknowledging potential valid contributions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a group of users, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem argument against pseudonymous contributors. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to suggest a change in platform functionality, which is a responsible use of discourse, but it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.