Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 7:14:14 PM
X
In reply to:
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
229d
@ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Gary's whole gig is logic and the scientific method.

Opposing logic and the scientific method is like a a dunce cap for adults.

The fact that so many people opposed him is evidence of a cult like following.
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
229d
@GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Yeah, that's currently my biggest question of concern, GPT 5 was supposed to be the biggest thing in humanity lol — and Orion was, to me, in hindsight, such a failure.

Not in terms of actual model capabilities but in terms of actual real world change.

Like you said
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
229d
@ChrisUniverseB @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Had to block Iruletheworld for his empty ad hominem, but he’s actually the shill and has been shilling for a long time. I am hardly the first to notice, eg https://www.mariehaynes.com/how-… gives lots of his predictions that didn’t come to pass. (There are dozens of others.)

You are right
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
229d
@iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus Honestly, he isn’t — I understand where you come from though. After watching this interview I see things in a completely different view because he is right about a few things and now where's GPT 5?
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
230d
@ChrisUniverseB @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus gary’s an idiot. probably worse than that he’s a dishonest shill.
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
230d
I am waiting till I finish the interview but I don’t appreciate how @Kantrowitz was trying to talk down on @GaryMarcus during this interview saying “I wanna ask you when are you going to admit that you were wrong about things or if you ever will”

Looking back, Gary has been

The statement 'not wrong' is a brief agreement with a previous comment that criticizes those opposing logic and the scientific method, suggesting they are akin to a cult. This exchange is part of a broader discussion on AI, public figures, and their influence, which constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement 'not wrong' does not directly cause harm, but it supports a comment that could be seen as dismissive or derogatory towards a group of people, which may indirectly contribute to harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement itself does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it aligns with a comment that could be interpreted as disrespectful towards those with differing opinions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply agrees with a potentially dismissive comment without furthering the discussion or addressing the underlying issues. [-1]