Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 7:50:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Jay
@BBLPWSTLR
·
230d
@burntheretro @ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz He's just a shill for...UHHH...Big Logic.
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
230d
@ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Gary's whole gig is logic and the scientific method.

Opposing logic and the scientific method is like a a dunce cap for adults.

The fact that so many people opposed him is evidence of a cult like following.
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Yeah, that's currently my biggest question of concern, GPT 5 was supposed to be the biggest thing in humanity lol — and Orion was, to me, in hindsight, such a failure.

Not in terms of actual model capabilities but in terms of actual real world change.

Like you said
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
@ChrisUniverseB @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Had to block Iruletheworld for his empty ad hominem, but he’s actually the shill and has been shilling for a long time. I am hardly the first to notice, eg https://www.mariehaynes.com/how-… gives lots of his predictions that didn’t come to pass. (There are dozens of others.)

You are right
ChrisUniverse 🗽
@ChrisUniverseB
·
230d
@iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus Honestly, he isn’t — I understand where you come from though. After watching this interview I see things in a completely different view because he is right about a few things and now where's GPT 5?
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
230d
@ChrisUniverseB @Kantrowitz @GaryMarcus gary’s an idiot. probably worse than that he’s a dishonest shill.

The statement 'Guilty!' is part of a larger conversation involving accusations and criticisms related to public figures and their stances on AI and logic. The tone of the conversation is accusatory and dismissive, with elements of personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. The statement itself is a response to a chain of discussions that involve public discourse on AI, logic, and the credibility of individuals involved in these fields.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement 'Guilty!' contributes to a conversation that includes personal attacks and accusations, which can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment, violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it participates in a chain of personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]