The statement 'Might have to change my bio to “Shilling for Big Logic Since 1992”' is part of a broader conversation about the role of logic and the scientific method in AI discussions. It appears to be a sarcastic response to accusations of shilling and a defense of logical reasoning in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the sarcasm could be seen as dismissive of opposing views.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a conversation that includes ad hominem attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is sarcastic and does not address the substance of the disagreement. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.