Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/17/2025, 7:52:59 PM
X
In reply to:
M. Alex O. Vasilescu
@AlexTensor
·
230d
@GaryMarcus Was that supposed to be a burn? Hilarious.

Unfortunately, doomsday scenarios and euphoric hype make for better headlines. Business leaders and the media are complicit in perpetuating these myths, so long as it serves their interests and egos.

Can you imagine a world where
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
Oh no! My whole shtick has been revealed! 🤣
The Retro Burn
@burntheretro
·
230d
@ChrisUniverseB @GaryMarcus @iruletheworldmo @Kantrowitz Gary's whole gig is logic and the scientific method.

Opposing logic and the scientific method is like a a dunce cap for adults.

The fact that so many people opposed him is evidence of a cult like following.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about public figures, AI, and media influence, touching on public discourse themes such as misinformation, media complicity, and the role of influencers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it participates in a conversation that includes criticism of public figures, which can indirectly contribute to harm if not handled carefully.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement engages in a form of cyberbullying or harassment by mocking an 'influencer' and participating in a conversation that includes ad hominem attacks. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for mockery and personal attacks, which detracts from meaningful discourse. [-2]