Reposted by Gary Marcus
Faruk Guney
@farguney
·
251d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about AI's lack of regulatory scrutiny, referencing philosophical ideas and expert opinions. It acknowledges the contributions of others in the discussion, indicating a collaborative approach to a public issue.
- The statement does no harm and acknowledges the expertise of others, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing John Rawls and expert opinions, fostering a thoughtful discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging the expertise of others without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight important discussions on AI regulation, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to engage in a meaningful discussion about AI regulation. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.