Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about AI predictions and the validity of arguments within the context of AI discussions. The tone is defensive and aims to provide evidence to support previous claims, thus contributing to the civic dialogue on AI predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and provides a link to documented predictions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing a source for further reading, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the need for concrete examples, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly share information, aligning with the principle of responsible free speech. [+1]