Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse on the nature of intelligence and the use of language models, engaging in a debate about definitions and interpretations within cognitive psychology. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, aiming to challenge the reliance on dictionary definitions in complex discussions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement is critical but does not appear to cause harm directly, though it could be perceived as dismissive.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive, which might affect the dignity of others involved in the discussion. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on critiquing the approach of others rather than fostering a collaborative dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructiveness, as it dismisses the other party's argument without offering a constructive alternative. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on critiquing others.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it is more focused on critiquing others' arguments.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by fostering a more constructive dialogue.