Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
5/21/2025, 3:40:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Guy Gadboit
@gadboit
·
258d
@GaryMarcus
Guy Gadboit
@gadboit
·
1376d
@_C3TPO_ Gadboit's Law: we shouldn't worry about the singularity because extremely dumb AI will kill us all long before superintelligence is achieved.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
Concise statement of why I am so concerned about the near-term consequences of AI even though I don’t think that AGI per se is imminent.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
@daganshani1 I think AGI is a decade or more way but there are many routes to catastrophe that come from accidents or misuse of unreliable AI that is not well aligned with human values if it is overused, which is exactly where we are headed.

The statement 'probably not all but quite possibly many' is a brief and vague response in a larger conversation about the risks and consequences of AI, particularly concerning AGI and its potential misuse. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of AI development and safety, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its vagueness does not contribute to a clear understanding of the issue.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks clarity and does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It does not add meaningful insight to the discussion. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is too vague to be considered a personal attack or ad hominem, but it also does not contribute to a productive conversation. [-1]