Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a discussion on AI capabilities and potential future developments. It critiques a chart related to AI progress, suggesting skepticism about its accuracy. The tone is critical, aiming to challenge the validity of the presented data.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the accuracy of information, which can be constructive if done respectfully.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By questioning the data, it could promote a deeper understanding and critical analysis of AI developments. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in critique, which can be constructive if it leads to a meaningful dialogue about the data's validity. [+1]