Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/22/2025, 5:19:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Fabio
@FabioA
·
259d
@SigalSamuel I think @GaryMarcus should be interested in this paper.

(My use of "should" is entirely purposeful)
Sigal Samuel
@SigalSamuel
·
259d
Okay, my favorite AI paper of the year so far has arrived. In this new gem, researchers point out something I think should be obvious but seems not to be for many people working on AI safety:

There is no One True Answer when it comes to morality!

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05197

The statement is part of a conversation about an AI paper discussing societal and technological progress, which is a public issue. The tone is neutral and acknowledges the paper's relevance to ongoing discussions in AI safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and neutrally acknowledges the paper's relevance, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By engaging in a discussion about AI safety, the statement promotes understanding of a complex issue, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss a public issue, aligning with the principle. [+1]