Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement engages in public discourse by critiquing a public analysis of AI developments, referencing notable figures and media. It expresses admiration for the effort but questions the analysis, indicating a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and maintains a respectful tone, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the effort behind AI 2027, though it disagrees with the analysis. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, adhering to this principle. [+1]