Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of a fictional work, 'AI 2027,' on public perception of AI. It acknowledges the intention to provoke action through fear but expresses concern about the seriousness with which the fiction is taken. The tone is critical yet respectful, aiming to clarify the nature of the work as fiction rather than science.
- The statement aims to clarify misconceptions, potentially reducing harm caused by misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by distinguishing between fiction and science, fostering informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The critique is constructive, focusing on the work's impact rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.