Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/22/2025, 6:48:37 PM
X
In reply to:
Beyond the Headlines 👓
@rt__bth
·
259d
@GaryMarcus Is this what you meant when you said @OpenAI would be come the largest, most invasive, and prolific A Surveillance Machine in history?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
260d
When in doubt, pivot.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about privacy and surveillance related to OpenAI's activities. It implies skepticism and criticism of OpenAI's potential impact on privacy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm related to surveillance, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy by highlighting potential invasions, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of OpenAI's actions, which can be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue, but lacks specific constructive suggestions.