In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
63d
The statement addresses a significant public issue regarding government actions and civil liberties, specifically the labeling of opponents of COVID-19 mandates as 'Domestic Violent Extremists.' It suggests that this designation infringes on First Amendment rights and opens the door to investigations based on vaccine mandate skepticism.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to civil liberties, suggesting a violation of the principle to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the respect for privacy and dignity of individuals labeled as extremists, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or harassment by the government. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential overreach of government actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of government policies, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on policy implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.