In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
64d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
64d
The statement involves a discussion on government actions and public safety, touching on issues of free speech and civil liberties. It critiques the labeling of certain individuals as 'Domestic Violent Extremists' based on their opposition to COVID-19 mandates, suggesting this infringes on First Amendment rights.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by labeling individuals as extremists, suggesting it could unjustly target people for their beliefs. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It argues that the designation may infringe on privacy and dignity by potentially investigating individuals for their views. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of government actions, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to highlight perceived overreach by authorities, aiming to inform the public about these actions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.