Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a response to a tweet by Steven Pinker criticizing Trump's policies on foreign students, indicating a shift in support due to perceived harmful actions. It engages with public issues related to immigration and education policies, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement expresses disapproval of actions perceived as harmful, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By expressing a change in support due to harmful policies, the statement promotes empathy and understanding for affected individuals. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing on policy criticism instead. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the individual's influence to potentially sway public opinion against harmful policies, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly expressing a political opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.