In reply to:
Victor Poulos
@Rex_Karz
·
167d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
167d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the concept of revolution and the role of government and constitutional principles, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and questions the idea of dismantling government structures as a form of revolution.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions a potentially harmful idea, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement challenges an idea but does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, remaining neutral on this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning another's viewpoint without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question a public issue responsibly, aligning with the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.