In reply to:
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
167d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to free speech, government regulation, and ethical journalism. It questions the actions of a journalist and the implications of government control over discourse, thus contributing to a broader civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of another's actions, which could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech, though it challenges the actions of a journalist.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by defending the right to discuss topics freely, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.