Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6

The statement engages in a public discourse about the role of government in regulating discussions on race and the use of taxpayer money, touching on issues of free speech and government spending.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially escalating the conversation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of the term 'fascist indoctrination' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks by labeling the opposing view as 'fascist indoctrination,' which is not constructive criticism. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful.