Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
5/29/2025, 7:49:19 AM
X
In reply to:
Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader
@DrKarlynB
·
166d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey She has a taxpayer funded job at a public university.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
166d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
167d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a debate about the role of educators in public universities and their relationship with government policies. The tone is critical, suggesting that the educator's role should not align with government directives, implying a defense of academic freedom.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of a perceived alignment with government, which could be seen as harmful to the individual's professional reputation. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not attack the individual personally, focusing instead on their role. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by defending the educator's right to teach independently of government influence. Adheres to the principle. [+1]