Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47

Score 68

@johnnyransom007 @DeAngelisCorey Someone working for the government has an oath to the Constitution, not to the President. If Trump doesn't want to talk about race, he doesn't have to. He has NO RIGHT to tell people working for the government what they can and cannot discuss. Diversity is part of America's

5/29/2025, 7:53:15 AM

In reply to:

John Ransom

@johnnyransom007

54d

@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey Well, when she works for the government, yeah, duh.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

54d

@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free

Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

@DeAngelisCorey

54d

BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government employees' rights to discuss topics such as diversity and race, and the limits of presidential authority over such discussions. It challenges the notion of government control over free speech and emphasizes constitutional obligations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on constitutional rights, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the dignity of government workers by emphasizing their oath to the Constitution rather than to a political figure, avoiding harassment or hate speech. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By advocating for the discussion of diversity and constitutional rights, the statement promotes understanding and empathy. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the idea that the President can dictate what government employees discuss, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by defending the right of government employees to discuss important societal issues, using the platform responsibly. [+1]