Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 68
5/29/2025, 7:54:37 AM
X
In reply to:
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
54d
@marwilliamson @DrKarlynB Her job should be to teach. Not inject racism into the university.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
54d
@DrKarlynB @DeAngelisCorey And her job is to teach. Not be government's mouthpiece.
Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader
@DrKarlynB
·
54d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey She has a taxpayer funded job at a public university.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
54d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
54d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement 'Not all discussion of race is racism! You know that.' is part of a broader conversation about the role of educators and the discussion of race in academic settings. It addresses the accusation of injecting racism into university teaching and defends the idea that discussing race is not inherently racist. The tone is defensive and aims to clarify a misunderstanding or mischaracterization of discussing race.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a misconception about discussing race, which can reduce potential harm caused by misinterpretations. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between discussing race and racism, fostering a more nuanced conversation. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by defending the right to discuss race in an academic context, using the platform to clarify and promote open dialogue. [+1]