Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 68
5/29/2025, 8:08:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader
@DrKarlynB
·
53d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey Her job is to do what she is told to do.

She doesn’t get to set the conditions of her job. That is far above her pay grade.

I worked in higher education for ten years.

She put the universities federal funding in jeopardy, people have lost their jobs over far less.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
53d
@DrKarlynB @DeAngelisCorey And her job is to teach. Not be government's mouthpiece.
Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader
@DrKarlynB
·
53d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey She has a taxpayer funded job at a public university.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
53d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
53d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the role of educators in public universities, government influence, and free speech, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is inquisitive, seeking clarification on the actions of the individual being discussed.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without resorting to personal attacks, maintaining a neutral and inquisitive tone. [+1]