Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 69
5/29/2025, 8:27:30 AM
X
In reply to:
Melody Surfing
@CricketSurfing
·
50d
@marwilliamson @DeAngelisCorey Not exactly. I object to my taxpayer money going to this.

They can do DEI on their own dime.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
51d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in educational institutions, a topic of public concern. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on what aspects of DEI are considered offensive by the other party.

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification on what is considered offensive, which can foster empathy and compassion by addressing misunderstandings. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking specific questions rather than resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]