Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 69
5/29/2025, 8:28:49 AM
X
In reply to:
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
50d
@marwilliamson Discuss whatever you want. Don't force taxpayers to fund racist indoctrination.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
50d
@DeAngelisCorey So you think it’s basically OK for the government to tell people what they can and cannot discuss, and you think you’re doing the work of ethical journalism by “exposing” a fellow citizen for saying she’s going to talk about whatever she wants to talk about because this is a free
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
@DeAngelisCorey
·
51d
BREAKING: Undercover journalists caught an administrator at UNC bragging about pushing DEI despite it being banned.

She says staff just "FINESSE" the language.

They do "work that is COVERT."

The university provost RAN AWAY when confronted.

I have the video.
Buckle up 👇🧵

The statement by @DeAngelisCorey questioning the 'racist indoctrination' is part of a public discourse on the topic of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in educational institutions. The conversation involves a debate on whether DEI initiatives constitute 'racist indoctrination' and the role of government and journalism in addressing such issues. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on a serious accusation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but questions a potentially harmful accusation, maintaining a neutral tone.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification, which can foster dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the basis of an accusation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate responsibly. [+1]