Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a public concern regarding the influence of language models (LLMs) on individuals' beliefs and the perceived lack of responsibility by OpenAI. The tone is critical and suggests a lack of trust in OpenAI's handling of the situation.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies that OpenAI's actions (or lack thereof) may lead to harm by not addressing the issue of misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize OpenAI's perceived negligence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and critical.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a general accusation without offering a solution or engaging with OpenAI directly.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's platform to highlight a societal issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by providing constructive feedback or solutions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.