Dean Blundell🇨🇦
@ItsDeanBlundell
·
52d
In reply to:
wjmccartan-Billy
@WilliamJMcCart7
·
51d
The statement and its context involve a discussion about Canada's military policy and its relationship with the U.S., which is a public issue. The tone is somewhat confrontational, with a focus on keeping up with current events. The conversation touches on international relations and defense policies, which are significant public discourse topics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader discussion that could be polarizing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but includes a confrontational tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and leans towards a personal attack by implying someone is not informed. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.