The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing the unresolved issues in AI development, particularly the alignment problem. The tone is critical and challenges the claims of AI companies regarding their progress.
- The statement does not directly harm but criticizes the lack of progress, which can be seen as constructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting ongoing issues in AI development.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the honesty of AI leaders and the effectiveness of their investments.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.