Jake Tapper

The statement and conversation involve a critique of political actions and decisions, specifically regarding the use of the Justice Department and political maneuvering related to the Iran deal. It engages with public issues such as political accountability and the integrity of governmental processes, thus constituting public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies political manipulation, which could be seen as harmful to public trust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations against political figures.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence, and it could be seen as a personal attack on political figures. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory nature without evidence. [-1]