Jake Tapper

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 108

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the actions of political figures and the implications of political decisions, specifically regarding the Justice Department and the Iran deal. The tone suggests skepticism and implies political maneuvering.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies political manipulation, which could be seen as harmful to public trust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of political figures.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and skeptical. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it implies wrongdoing without providing evidence or engaging in discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as undermining trust in public institutions. [-1]