Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/30/2025, 7:06:31 PM
X
In reply to:
Pat Riarchy
@Dr_Pat_Riarchy
·
233d
@GaryMarcus Seems to work ok
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
233d
Imagine spending a (few?) billion dollars on a product that generated almost no revenue and isn’t even competitive a few months after its release.

Ouch.
Andriy Burkov
@burkov
·
233d
@BioBayes 3.0 is no longer competitive.

The statement engages in a discussion about the competitiveness and financial sustainability of AI products, specifically Grok 3. It critiques the notion of lasting competitive advantages in the rapidly evolving AI industry.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and focuses on a critique of industry practices. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the challenges of maintaining a competitive edge in AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on industry trends. [+1]