Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing economic and regulatory aspects of AI development, particularly focusing on the financial viability and competitiveness of AI products like Grok 3. It critiques the economic implications of investing heavily in AI technologies that may quickly become obsolete, and it touches on broader regulatory concerns as highlighted in 'Taming Silicon Valley.'

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm and instead critiques economic decisions in AI development. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding by analyzing the economic and regulatory challenges in AI. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   Engages in constructive criticism of AI investments without personal attacks. [+1]