Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/3/2025, 3:58:53 PM
X
In reply to:
nobody
@idontknow99_99
·
33d
@marwilliamson @Kim_99xo An International consortium? When has that worked? Hate to tell you but enlightened Arab leaders wants nothing to do with them and refuse to accept them in their countries. Everyone is sick of them.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
@Kim_99xo There is no love where there is no justice. The situation has been festering for many years, although those who say it’s simple and black and white either do not understand or are willfully ignoring reality. At this point there needs to be an international consortium primarily by
Kim
@Kim_99xo
·
33d
@marwilliamson With so much division and hurt, how does the collective unconscious return to love?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
We seem to have gone from calling for justice for Palestinians - a call with which I wholeheartedly agree - to an absurd romanticization of a gigantic death cult. That cult is not just coming for the Jews. Those who continue yelling “We’re not antisemites!!!” while at least

The statement engages in a discussion about international relations and historical events related to peace efforts in the Middle East, specifically referencing the assassinations of leaders like Sadat and Rabin. It addresses the complexities of forming international coalitions and the challenges faced in achieving peace, thus contributing to public discourse on international diplomacy and conflict resolution.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it discusses historical events and possibilities for peace without inflammatory language. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by referencing historical events and the potential for international cooperation, though it could be more explicit in fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by addressing a previous comment and clarifying a misunderstanding, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]