Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/3/2025, 4:00:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Tony Princato
@TPrincato
·
33d
@marwilliamson @Kim_99xo Speaking of death cults, Jews just killed 40,000 people. On a per capita basis, it’s the most bloodthirsty religion in the world.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
@Kim_99xo There is no love where there is no justice. The situation has been festering for many years, although those who say it’s simple and black and white either do not understand or are willfully ignoring reality. At this point there needs to be an international consortium primarily by
Kim
@Kim_99xo
·
33d
@marwilliamson With so much division and hurt, how does the collective unconscious return to love?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
33d
We seem to have gone from calling for justice for Palestinians - a call with which I wholeheartedly agree - to an absurd romanticization of a gigantic death cult. That cult is not just coming for the Jews. Those who continue yelling “We’re not antisemites!!!” while at least

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the sensitive and complex issue of international conflicts and the loss of life associated with them. It compares the actions of different nations and leaders, contributing to a broader discussion on global violence and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it involves a comparison of death tolls in a manner that could be seen as insensitive to the victims and their families, potentially exacerbating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves a potentially inflammatory comparison that could be interpreted as minimizing the suffering of those involved in the conflicts. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a numerical comparison of deaths rather than fostering a deeper understanding of the underlying issues. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a stark comparison without context or an invitation for further discussion. [-2]