Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in a heated debate about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically addressing the legitimacy and morality of resistance actions. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, suggesting that certain actions are being mischaracterized as legitimate resistance. The statement implies a strong moral judgment against violence targeting civilians.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using inflammatory language that could escalate tensions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of others, as it implies malicious intent without constructive dialogue. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement fails to promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on condemnation. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for a confrontational approach instead. [-2]