The statement is a critical commentary on the expectations and definitions surrounding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It uses a sarcastic tone to express skepticism about the current state and future potential of AGI, suggesting that the reality does not meet the high expectations set by its proponents.
- The statement uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful to those who are genuinely interested in AGI. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it mocks a group of people, which is a violation of this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses sarcasm and generalization rather than addressing specific arguments or engaging in a meaningful discussion, which is a violation of this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.