Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
212d
@GaryMarcus 1. I agree that the systems are very limited - but the term AGI was initially contrasted with ANI, and it's silly to claim that current systems are narrow, even if they are not "True AGI"
2. Your bar keeps being human expert, not human average. That seems unreasonably high.
6/5/2025, 2:49:12 AM
X
In reply to:
prithvi
@anondeguerre
·
210d
@GaryMarcus Who says this? Gen q. I only see agi and asi projections where they easily surpass human ability in less than a decade.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
210d
Love it how AGI fans are pretending now that AGI has always meant “be as dumb as mediocre humans” rather “do the kinds of things smart humans can do”.

Some singularity that’s gonna be.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the definition and expectations of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), which is a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence and has implications for technology policy and societal impact. The tone of the conversation is analytical and involves a debate on the standards and definitions of AGI, contrasting it with Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI).

  1. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and the conversation it is part of aim to promote understanding of AGI by discussing its definitions and implications, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation involves constructive criticism and dialogue about the expectations and definitions of AGI, without resorting to personal attacks, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism. [+1]