In reply to:
Roy
@Rwill235
·
202d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the actions and words of a public figure, LeCun, in the context of AI development and public statements. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that LeCun stole ideas after initially ridiculing them.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it accuses LeCun of stealing ideas, which could harm his reputation. This is a violation of the principle. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it accuses LeCun of theft and ridicule, which could be considered a form of harassment or defamation. This is a violation of the principle. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it makes a personal attack by accusing LeCun of stealing ideas, which is an ad hominem argument. This is a violation of the principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.